The Struggle of Gardening

Gardening, though not my passion, does have its moments with me. I am routinely outside every fall planting tulips and daffodil bulbs. Likewise, Joanna and I have been struggling for the ten plus years we have been here working on a garden that blossoms through out the summer.

And I can say there are some success stories with that goal in mind! Aside from the Tulips and Daffodils in the spring we do have the day lilies that are routinely coming back in the early summer now. Likewise, we have two rose bushes, or actually rose patches-as they do spread, that blossom at different times through the season. Likewise we have in the upper garden Phlox starting to take over in both beds. Ideally they will just climb on up the hill!

Down below next my office is one of the  rose patches. On the other side of the path are Sedum and Black Eyed Susan. Again patches of each the length of the rose patch on the other side.

Yes there has been some successes here.  And yes we still have the weeds too!

Violet and White Phlox in the upper gardens!

More of the Phlox

And the White climbing up the hill!

The Black Eyed Susan to the right, and the Sedum in front of it, which is just starting to bloom in September! And the roses over to the left with one lone flower.

Again the Sedum, the Black Eyed Susan and a Mystery Flower that I am still tracking down!

In short, we are not talking the New York Botanical Garden but still actually kind of cool.

Some Thoughts on Paul Ryan, and Ayn Rand

It was interesting to hear that Romney had selected Paul Ryan for his Vice Presidential running-mate. Interesting in that Ryan is an admitted fan of the philosopher or intellectual, Ayn Rand, suggesting or perhaps even requiring staff members to read Atlas Shrugged. He is found making reference to her and how important her philosophy and her morality is to the defense of capitalism as per various clips that can be found on YouTube. So in this light alone it is interesting.

It is interesting to me however, as I too was reading the same books and essays back in high school. It basically led me to get a degree in philosophy. So for me to hear that Paul Ryan, who has pushed to dramatically re-invent Medicare and push aggressive budget cutting plans, started from the same intellectual timber. It made me reflect on my own intellectual development.  

Rand is a controversial thinker in that she defends a pure Laissez-Faire capitalism, What that amounts to is that she was opposed to any government that redistributed wealth in any fashion. Whether it was Social Security, Medicare, or any other type of government support or subsidy; she was opposed to it.

Her philosophy also entailed a discussion of selfishness as the core of ethics, as opposed to any concern or awareness of others. Likewise her epistemology was very focused on reason and is largely a refutation of Kant and his limiting of reason in his Critiques. These positions led her to a complete abandonment of the Judeo-Christian tradition and really any type of religious faith.

Considering the above, I do wonder if Ayn Rand would have any use for Paul Ryan. His economics are perhaps more a mix of supply side theory, which she had no use for back in the 80s. More important though is that Ryan is a devout Catholic. I am not sure how one can reconcile her philosophy with Catholicism. So at first blush I would have to say I am not sure he really is a fan of Ayn Rand. She is a thinker that demands you either accept her basic principles or you do not. She required consistency, was not a fan of compromise, and had no use for either philosophical or political pragmatism. She probably would not have much to do with Paul Ryan.

I pause on the above as one of her disciples, back in the fifties, did later in life go on to become a Chairman of the Federal Reserve. I am not sure what she would have to say about Alan Greenspan today, but he also \pursued a career in the public sphere. In short that is a separate essay.

Aside from my questions on Ryan's sincerity or self-deception regarding Rand, I realize that I have moved so far away from her. Philosophically, I have come to embrace the principle of charity as a key tool in epistemology, a tool that dates back to Augustine, a Christian Saint. I do still have a libertarian streak in me and with that subscribe to some of her focus on the individual and selfishness.

Most important though is my realization that her philosophy is not adequate in describing the American economic engine - historically or today. The government simply has played a role in the economy since Lewis and Clarke, Manifest Destiny and the land grants that went with the first trans-continental railroads.

If you jump to science and technology, unless you focus only on Thomas Edison and the other great inventors of that period, you realize the debt our technology has to the basic research done by or funded by the US Government. From the Agriculture Colleges of the early twentieth century, to the Manhattan Project, to the fear of sputnik and the military-industrial complex, to DARPA and  the Internet-the US government has played a role in technological innovation and the economy..In short, if you attribute our economic success to technological savvy, you need to acknowledge the role of the government. 

If you step back from the role of government, to the role of the individual the history of science challenges Rand on that also. Again, it is not one individual but groups of individuals communicating back and forth that allowed the US to achieve the things it did. James Burke in his 1970's miniseries Connections illustrates this beautifully. Steve Jobs is not John Galt. He might also be compared to Stalin. I exaggerate but he did have a partner and multiple teams. Jobs may not have been able to code his devices, but he did have some marketing skills.

Going back to Ryan, I am not sure what to say. Do we take him at his word and factor in that he subscribed or does value this thinker? As he has been in the House for at least the last ten years, could he truly believe that all government involvement in the economy is wrong? Could he subscribe to her demand for consistency and and further her intolerance for compromise and still function in the US House or Representatives? Or do we simply acknowledge that he, like myself has evolved and adopted as required. Something that Rand could probably not accept.

Walls, Neighbors and Warzones

This is not my typical content, but something I am sure everyone runs into at some point. Basically a problem any and all who live in a community encounter-neighbors.

What do you do with the neighbor who builds something or neglects his property in a way that leaves you wondering what is he doing or worse just effects the community? 

I am dealing with such today. Basically a neighbor who owns a house two doors down. He decided recently that he would convert part of of his small lot behind his residence into a parking lot. At first blush this was good - less cars on an already congested street. The challenge was that his lot was on a hill and to properly level the lot, he needed a substantial retaining wall.

He had apparently went back and forth with the township on what was acceptable, got the proper permits, and proceeded to build such a wall. I wish I had participated in these discussions but neither my neighbors nor I had been made aware of them. At least I had not.

The pictures displayed here show the results. I am not sure if the owner is done or what. For the past year approximately we have had the long row of fitted blocks. It looked like the beginnings of a bunker or a 3rd rate highway project. I now use it as a landmark when giving directions to my residence. "You are getting close when you see this big ugly concrete block wall on your left. . ." 

In the last week, however, workers have returned. Now we have the four or five blocks, which extend the wall. These new blocks are just piled on top of each other. These are not even properly fitted or joined. Plus there is a pile of rubble-cinder blocks, concrete, whatever sticking out into the street. Hopefully they will return and complete the project, but who knows.

Anyway, for now I share here, partly to vent, partly to look for suggestions and hear others' experiences with such things. I have not yet called the township, nor tracked down the owner, who does not reside there. Hopefully this week I will call the town clerk and see what the options are. I was so tempted to just get a can of red spray paint and right in the center of the one wall spray-write "WTF" in nice bold letters. My wife vetoed that idea.

Web 2.0 and now Web 3.0?

We all know Web 2.0 by this point; the idea of users creating and sharing their own content, making the web and the sites they use their own. As a recruiter it is a staple that any good web application developer, whether coming from a Java, PHP, or .Net background, is going to have AJAX and ideally some Jquery skills. In the end that is probably the lasting technical contribution of Web 2.0 - the innovation and evolution of JavaScript and with it the ability for those with a web browser to share various content.

The feature that drove JavaScript's success, however, is the lightness of the code. In the beginning of the era it was largely Flash and Flex that facilitated this model. Then in 2008 and 2009 you started to hear of enterprise level projects replacing Flex with JavaScript components. Likewise you saw Steve Jobs and Apple choose not to embrace Flash. In short, with the limitations of smart phone browsers, and even the latest browsers used on old-fashion PCs, much less today's tablets, we see a desire for lighter and faster loading code. Ajax and the various JavaScript libraries seem to be the winners.

It must be noted here that XML was the other winner here. I remember discussions way back in 2001 and 2002 about the possibilities of XML. Today we use it and embrace those offerings routinely. XML is the X in AJAX. And even here JavaScript offers an alternative to XML in JSON.

So at this point the above is largely history. With Facebook and Linkedin, and all the other social-media sites out there today, we have exhausted the possibilities of Web 2.0. Such sites will not disappear though I am sure that we will see some battles ahead of between entities such as Linkedin, Google+, Facebook and others! We will continue to update out Twitter accounts, and share pictures on Facebook and announce our new position or title on Linkedin. Likewise, the technology will continue to evolve. We have certainly not seen the last version of JavaScript much less HTML.

All that said, what will the web offer us next? What is its next evolution? It seems that the next evolution is the management of data. This is seen in two unique spaces: the cloud and the semantic web. The cloud of course is a hot topic today. For those who have embraced all these various social media websites, which are accessed from one's phone, tablet, home and work PCs, there is a challenge. Where do I store my various pieces of data so that I can access them from any device? Prior to the cloud there was no central storage area for all one's pics, videos, and whatever else.

Granted this is only a small component of the cloud aimed at individual users but it does point to a challenge. If the individual has challenges accessing and managing his or her own data, what do we do with all the data that is being created around us? How do we keep up with the massive onslaught of twitter updates, blog postings, YouTube clips and whatever else is out there?

Stay tuned for the answer to this question, an exploration into the Semantic Web, and what I believe Web 3.0 will entail.